Read the decision carefully.
If no period is visible, operative part, reasons and appeal instruction must be read together.
If no voluntary departure period is visible, check the decision, suspensive effect, enforcement risk and appeal deadline.
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
If a return decision does not show a period for voluntary departure, uncertainty begins immediately. People ask whether removal can happen at once, whether an appeal still has effect and which deadline is running.
This article covers the narrow urgent case. The ordinary deadline is explained in the article on voluntary departure and entry ban; extending an existing period is a separate topic.
Answer one short question. The result shows the first checkpoint.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
The answer separates no period, removal of suspensive effect and unclear wording.
If no period is visible, operative part, reasons and appeal instruction must be read together.
If suspensive effect was removed, check separately whether enforcement can happen quickly.
Even a short period must be calculated and compared with appeal, requirements and obstacles to departure.
The period for voluntary departure is regulated in section 55 FPG. It is linked to the return decision and clarifies whether and within what period a voluntary departure is possible. If no such period is visible, first check whether it was not granted or only worded differently.
The ordinary situation is covered in the article on the voluntary departure period. This text remains with the narrow case where no period is visible or immediate enforcement appears likely.
The voluntary departure question is not identical with the suspensive effect of an appeal. Section 18 BFA-VG may be relevant where suspensive effect is removed. Whether an appeal temporarily blocks enforcement must be read separately from the decision.
If suspensive effect is central, see the article on suspensive effect in entry ban cases. That article deals with the appeal path, not only the departure period.
Where no period is granted, three levels must be separated: the operative part on the return decision, the enforcement question and the appeal deadline. Only then can one decide whether urgent action is required.
Requirements under section 56 FPG may also matter. The article on requirements for voluntary departure explains that point. If more time is the issue, see extension of the departure period.
No voluntary departure period is not automatically unlawful in every case. Legal basis, reasons, risk assessment, suspensive effect and actual enforcement situation are decisive.
This article stays with return decision, termination of stay and entry ban. Positive residence permit or NAG questions are not the topic.
Practical point: If no departure period is visible, read the full operative part first. Do not rely only on the last page.
CTA: If no voluntary departure period is visible, we review decision, enforcement risk and appeal deadline promptly.
No. It depends on the decision, reasons, suspensive effect and the specific statutory basis.
Read and secure operative part, reasons, appeal instruction and references to suspensive effect.
That depends on the decision and deadline. The appeal deadline must be checked separately from the departure period.
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000